June kicked off the North Atlantic and Eastern Pacific Hurricane season. Your participation really showed. This was the most active month since December 2012.
Also, we’re developing a couple of presentations for the American Meteorological Society’s Annual meeting in Phoenix, Arizona. The meeting isn’t until January, but the planning and preparation begins now, so please perform classifications to help make the presentations a success.
In June, Read More…
Not much has been happening in recent weeks in the tropics (with the notable exception of the extreme western Pacific), so allow me to try generate some fake excitement by highlighting one of our four featured storms – KULAB. Why Kulab? Well, I don’t know. It didn’t do anything extraordinary, unless you were a fish or an unfortunate fisherman. But it was there. And even though Kulab wasn’t a typhoon, didn’t make landfall, and has essentially been forgotten in the annals of history, we here at Cyclone Center want to see it analyzed because that is what we do. We do not discriminate on the basis of color, size, location, or weirdness of name. Every tropical cyclone has something to contribute, so we’re going to push for the completion of Kulab, because quite frankly nothing else is going on right now!
So usually when we have a featured storm, we can tell you a little bit about its name and history. I have no idea what a Kulab is. A quick check of Wikipedia turns up several leads. Apparently Kulab is a village in west central Iran with a population of 61 (!). I wonder if any of those villagers are classifying on Cyclone Center – can you imagine them logging on and seeing their village on the front page? What’s next, Typhoon Tehran? But wait, there is yet another Iranian village of Kulab in the eastern part of the country – this one with a population of 92! Google also tells me that Kulab is the “new West Flemish campus of the University of Leuven, created from the integration of the academic programs of VIVES North (formerly KHBO) and KU Leuven“. That would be in Belgium. I’m pretty sure we have some Belgian classifiers – maybe someone from Kulab?
I am sure that has gotten you very excited to classify Kulab. But just in case you still need some convincing, I give you kulab.org, the “Research Extension Page of Dr.K.Ulaganathan’s laboratory, Centre for Plant Molecular Biology, Osmania University, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA. Basically, they really like plants there and study them a lot. I’m certain that if you visited, they would have posters of Tropical Cyclone Kulab up all over the place.
So let me conclude by making this plea. Sometimes in life you have to trudge through the mundane (Kulab) to get to the good stuff (about any other storm). Storms have feelings too. Kulab has been sitting out there for a few weeks now wondering if anyone will click on him (her?). Sure, he gets a couple here and there, but then you leave him for the more exciting times at Cafe Sonca and Nesat. So lets show Kulab some love and get him some clicks so we can respectfully retire him. Are you with me?
- Chris Hennon is part of the Cyclone Center Science Team and Associate Professor of Atmospheric Sciences at the University of North Carolina at Asheville
The next four storms on CycloneCenter are new ones from the Western Pacific basin. They represent four storms that each start in a small region of the Pacific Ocean, but follow very different paths.
Ever wondered what happened to the baby that was shared time with you in the hospital nursery when you were born? Born in the same hospital on the same day, you have likely taken very different paths (unless you’re a twin).
Chalk it up to chaos (remember this wacky definition of it?) or something else, but it is interesting that — like babies in a hospital — tropical cyclones with similar origins take different paths as well. These storms — Kulap, Roke, Sonca and Nesat — formed in roughly the same location of the western Pacific Ocean in 2005 however they took very different paths.
Help us better understand their lifetime by classifying the Four Storms.
Also thanks for your help on the fours storms from 2004. They were a great success and the initial results look very good.
What a week we had! We had envisioned many classifications, but received so many more! So far we have received more than 11,000 classifications from nearly 2000 users in June. These storms had never been analyzed on CycloneCenter and Hurricane Charley was completed on the first day! Hurricane Frances is nearly complete now. We will likely have more completely new storms this month.
There are numerous crowdsourced science projects out there and each have the same goal: To better understand an issue (hurricanes, bats, animal populations, etc.) based on input from numerous clicks and selections from citizen scientists. In addition to the Zooniverse, there are other crowdsourced projects. The concept of learning from a crowd is not new. There are many mathematical and statistical papers available that provide a means to accurately learn the best possible answer based on everyone’s input.
In our analysis, we have used an approach to estimate a probability of a selection based on the selections from individuals, given what those individuals tend to select. It is a pretty complex algorithm that took me a while to understand, so I won’t belabor the point, but provide some links to the papers below. The method described by Raykar et al. is an Expectation Maximization (E-M) algorithm.
Our initial analysis is looking at what type of storm is the cyclone based on the broad categories available: No storm, Curved band, Embedded Center, Eye, Shear or Post tropical. Later, we plan to use this information to estimate of the storm’s intensity.
Hurricane Charley was relatively short-lived: only 6 days so only about 48 images. This means it was completed relatively quickly, contrast that with Frances which has nearly 150 images.
The following graphically denotes the basic selections for Hurricane Charley. The selections (or votes) by citizen scientists are denoted in the lower graph. Each column is the selections for a given image of a storm. The percentages show what fraction of the citizen scientists selected for an image. The upper graph denotes the probability of the image type based on the selections and the tendencies of the citizen scientists. These are most often 100% of one type, but can sometimes be a “toss-up” (i.e., no clear winner such as the case in the first two images of Charley).
Also, there is quite a bit of variance in the selections and no clear time period when the storm had an eye. This is partly an artifact of the satellite imagery. Each pixel is about 8km while operational data available to forecasters can be as high as 1 km for each pixel. Such resolution helps identify small eyes.
Even while Hurricane Frances is available for classifying, the early results are very good. They show a bit more consistency in the selections. Since it isn’t done yet, there are some images with less than 10 classifications, but it looks consistent so far.
The graph shows large agreement in storm type at various stages of hurricane development. The storm rapidly developed an eye by about day 3. It maintained an eye more most of the time between day 4-9. Then the primary type became embedded center with some selections of other types (e.g., shear). By day 12, the storm had begun to dissipate and was largely being classified as post-tropical or No storm.
Most of the users this month are new so these results certainly aren’t final. The learning algorithm needs lots more samples from all the new classifiers to more accurately understands their tendencies. As time goes on and those who were active on these storms classify other storms, the E-M algorithm will refine this storm.
Nonetheless, the results are very encouraging. In fact, we’ve made more than 180 of these plots for all storms that are complete (or nearly complete). The next step will be to further analyze the results and see how best to estimate storm intensity from these classifications.
The following papers were crucial in our initial analysis of the CycloneCenter data.
Learning from crowds 2010: VC Raykar, S Yu, LH Zhao, GH Valadez, C Florin, L Bogoni, L Moy, The Journal of Machine Learning Research 11, 1297-1322
This article is the basis for our current algorithm. At first I used the binary approach to determine which images had eyes. Then I applied the multi-class approach (section 3) for all storm types.
The official start of the hurricane season in the North Atlantic was June 1 and most experts are predicting a relatively quiet season, pointing to relatively cool water temperatures in place and a developing El Nino in the Pacific. El Nino can be thought of as a substantial warming of ocean water in the central and/or eastern Pacific which in turn alters global weather patterns. Atlantic hurricanes typically encounter more hostile atmospheric conditions during El Nino events, limiting their potential to develop and strengthen. Most of the inactive seasons in the Atlantic over the past 20 years have occurred during El Nino events.
Assuming that the seasonal forecasts are correct (which can be a leap of faith sometimes, especially since El Ninos can be difficult to forecast), an inactive season does not mean that the U.S. is significantly less vulnerable to a major hurricane landfall. The last major (Category 3 or higher on the Saffir-Simpson scale) hurricane to make a direct landfall in the U.S. was Hurricane Wilma nearly 9 years ago (Hurricane Sandy was not a major hurricane at landfall); this in an era of relatively high activity. Conversely, Hurricane Andrew (1992) was a Category 5 hurricane that devastated south Florida; there were only 6 tropical storms or hurricanes that year! Much has been written on this major hurricane landfall drought – most attribute it to luck.
To mark the beginning of the Atlantic season, this month Cyclone Center is going back 10 years to a time when major hurricanes seemed to come at the U.S. coastline every week. We will begin the month by featuring four storms that caused substantial problems for the state of Florida: Charley, Frances, Ivan, and Jeanne. 34 people lost their lives and almost $19 billion in damages was attributed to these storms. As the month progresses and our classifiers do their thing, we will cycle in other major hurricanes for classification.
Remember, your classifications will help us to improve our estimates of the strength of these storms. This in turn will help scientists to understand how tropical cyclones have been changing over the last three decades. Head on over to Cyclone Center and work on these major 2004 storms today.
- Chris Hennon is part of the Cyclone Center Science Team and Associate Professor of Atmospheric Sciences at the University of North Carolina at Asheville
With 15,000+ citizen scientists contributing to CycloneCenter.org, we have more than thirty thousand eyes searching through satellite data.
So far, everyone has provided input on almost 50,000 images. As we begin to sift through all the responses, one task is to determine the storm type (eye, shear, embedded center or curved band) of each image from all the responses.
The eye images seem to make up about 8% of our images so far. The image below is a collection of some of the images identified as eye scenes by the citizen scientists. This is only a small portion of what we have, but it shows great progress.
This contains only 391 of the ~4500 eye images identified. So, 30,000 human eyes have found 4500 storm eyes.
This month, we are naming the monthly award for the top classifier as the “Baja award” in honor of our consistent participant baha23 and retiring the name in recognition of the consistent contribution to the project from the monthly stat board (so that others can also be recognized for their effort). Likewise, the overall project activity list is now the “Bretarn board” in honor of our longtime contributor, bretarn (who also was our 300,000th classification).
Question of the Month: What is the best time to classify storms? Do you classify during your downtime? Answer in the comments below.
For March 2014, we had 7,964 classifications of 364 storms from 254 citizen scientists.
Top 10 most active citizen scientists for April 2014.
Baja Award: Most active citizen scientists each month.
The Bretarn Board: Most active citizen scientists overall.
Did you notice that peterthorne moved up a spot on the all time list. It turns out that work travel is a great time to classify storms. So why not use Airport wifi to classify storms while waiting in the airport??
Also, what do you think of the Baja award?
Hawaii – a tropical paradise, full of sun, fun, palm trees, beauty, mountains, volcanoes and more. But wait…have you ever thought about Hawaii and tropical cyclones? Although not frequent, tropical cyclones have battered the Hawaiian Islands several times in recent memory.
The 1950’s were a very active period for Hawaiian tropical cyclones. Hurricane Nina (1957) passed 100 miles west of Kauai, producing winds of 71 knots (kt) on the island of Honolulu. Nina brought heavy rain and wind to the islands, causing over $100,000 in damage. Two years later, Hurricane Dot (1959) impacted the islands of Hawaii. Days before landfall, Dot threatened the Hawaiian Islands with maximum sustained winds of 130 kt. However, she made landfall as a Category 1 storm, with gusts up to 87 kt. This weakening in strength lessened the extent of damages, although it left its mark in the form of 6 million dollars in damage.
Next on the list of memorable cyclones is Hurricane Iwa of 1982. Like Dot, Iwa was also a Category 1 hurricane. The island of Kauai felt the force of Iwa on November 3, 1982. Iwa brought winds of 96 kt., gusts over 104 kt., 30 foot waves, and storm surge.
Following this event, Hawaii was left with 234 million dollars in damages.
10 years later, in 1992, Hurricane Iniki released its wrath on Hawaii. In the Hawaiian language, Iniki means “strong and piercing wind’; this storm truly lived up to its meaning. Its eye passed over and slammed Kauai as a powerful Category 4 hurricane with winds up to 126 kt. Iniki claimed 6 lives and left the citizens of Hawaii to recover from 1.8 billion dollars in damages. Iniki destroyed over 1,000 homes and severely damaged more than 4,000.
To this day, Iniki may still carry a ring that brings back memories of devastation to the citizens of Hawaii.
It remains the strongest storm to date to hit Hawaii. Due to its devastation, the name ‘Iniki’ was retired in 1993. When the name of a hurricane has been retired, it cannot be used to name other storms for at least 10 years.
Hurricane Flossie (2013) was the most recent cyclone to affect Hawaii. It caused minor damage to the islands.
Visit Cyclone Center today, while there you may get the chance to classify images of Hurricanes Iwa and Iniki.
Davanna G. Saunders is an undergraduate student in Atmospheric Sciences at the University of North Carolina at Asheville. She recently joined the Cyclone Center team as a classifier and contributor to our social media.
In the Atlantic, the official dates for the hurricane season are 1 June – 30 November. This certainly doesn’t mean that cyclones only exist during this time frame, yet 97% of all cyclones that have developed have occurred during those months. While we really won’t know exactly how many cyclones have developed out of season prior to 20th century technological advances, there is evidence of off-season storms in the Atlantic dating back to May of 1771, and more recently tropical storm Beryl in May of 2012. Most cyclones that develop out of season do not typically impact the U.S., but there have been more than handful that have, giving us pause to think what a fickle planet our Earth can be.
Data records of cyclones from the 18th, 19th, and early 20th century have to be taken with a grain of salt, as the technology advancements we enjoy now weren’t available then. However, it is interesting to note that in 1908, not one, but two cyclones developed outside of the seasonal timeline; the first occurred from March 6th-9th and impacted the Lesser Antilles with estimated winds of 100mph (161km/h); the second occurred from May 24th to May 31st with estimated winds of 75mph (121km/h), affecting the Outer Banks of North Carolina. The Outer Banks were impacted yet again in May of 1951 when Hurricane Able made landfall as a category 3 with winds of 115mph (185km/h). Hurricane Alice, a category 1 storm, became the first recorded to exist in two different calendar years, when it developed on December 30th, 1954, and dissipated on January 6th, 1955. This has occurred recently, with tropical storm Zeta developing on December 30th, 2005 and dissipating on January 7th, 2006.
Going back over the past 50 years, there have been several years that have seen more than one cyclone develop out of season; 1969 (2), 1973 (2), 2003 (3), 2005 (2), 2007 (2), and 2012 (2).
Of these years, it is interesting to note that in 2003, tropical cyclones developed both before and after the standard begin/end dates (1 June/30 November). Ana developed in April, and Odette and Peter continued the already lengthened season when they both developed in early December. Also of note is that during the 2012 season, both out of season storms occurred in May within a week of each other (Alberto and Beryl), and both did impact the U.S. With the vast amount of satellite data stored at cyclonecenter.org, it is possible that you may classify images of Alberto and/or Beryl. The take-home from all of this is that while the majority of cyclones occur within a 5-month window, cyclones can develop any time of year, which is a good reason to stay aware of what is going on in the tropics all year long.
- Kyle Gayan is an undergraduate student in Atmospheric Sciences at the University of North Carolina at Asheville and is also a retired USAF Master Sergeant; his 20 years of service was spent exclusively in the weather career field. He recently joined the Cyclone Center team as a classifier and contributor to our social media.
March 2014 saw the most monthly classifications since March 2013!! Also, Citizen Scientist baha23 set an all time record with 4610 classifications in a month.
We reached a milestone of 300,000+ classifications on March 10th! We’ll have a highlight of the classifier who made that classification soon.
One table that doesn’t change much is the top 10 all time classifiers. But this month, we have a new citizen scientist on that list: skl6284, who moved into 9th place. However, FrederikeLisanne could move onto the all time leaderboard with more months of 700+ classifications.
This month was very active. Calbeam had 243 classifications which would have been 4th place in January but is only 10th this month!
For March 2014, we had 15,666 classifications of 531 storms from 638 citizen scientists.
Top 10 most active citizen scientists for March 2014.
Most active citizen scientists each month.
Most active citizen scientists overall.
Why was this monthly update so late? We receive weekly deliveries of data on Sundays, so we had to wait until Monday April 7th to complete the summary for March. Thanks for your patience.